Thursday, November 29, 2012

Defining "Biblical"


          Biblical values. Biblical politics. Biblical models and definitions of marriage, etc. The term “biblical” has become a buzzword in the socio-political arena. I remember James Dobson objecting to Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, claiming he wasn’t advocating a “biblical form of government,” but he never really elaborated on that. Recently, Jon Stewart lashed back at Mike Huckabee for talking about the “biblical model of marriage,” which Stewart said was polygamy. Many Christian leaders encouraged citizens, in the past few months, to vote for biblical values, not explaining much what they were. Some cling to the term “biblical” as a kitschy cliche, while others disregard it. But, in most cases, it’s misunderstood.
          What’s biblical is not determined by strict literalist and exemplary interpretation. This is how, for example, people look at the polygamy and misogyny in the Old Testament and assume this is the “biblical model” of marriage. That’s like saying the Shakespearean model for transitioning royal leadership is conspiracy and assassination.
          Also, what’s biblical isn’t determined by taking verses or passages out of context. This is how, for example, look at the anointment of Saul in the early chapters of 1 Samuel and tote, perhaps, theocracy as the “biblical model” of government. But comparing the ancient and covenanted Israel with any modern and non-covenanted nation is poor interpretation.
          Finding what’s biblical involves a bit more reading context, studying history and objectivity. We’re to understand genres and look for themes. This is why most churches prefer pastors who graduated from seminaries which largely require a plethora of studies in history and ancient languages and literature.
          So, what is “biblical” is not always a shallow opinion. However, what’s “biblical” is not always clear. When we assert something as “biblical,” we need to be able to explain both its biblical-ity and its practicality, out of respect to the Bible. If we appear anti-intellectual, hypocritical or confused about our interpretation of the Bible, it will only become less and less believable.
          After all, there are some positives to studying and discussing the Bible.

No comments: